Rahul Gandhi presents a different opinion about the CEC appointment, says 'disrespectful, infallible' for PM Modi, Amit Shah to … | Mint

Rahul Gandhi, leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha, “presented a different opinion during the meeting to select the next Chief Election Commissioner,” said Congress on Tuesday in a position on X. The party said that Gandhi's abnormal remark Response was to the decision of the Panel -led Panel to complete the name of the next main election commissioner.

The congress claimed that the decision was taken despite the objections of the party.

On February 17, the Gyanesh Kumar government appointed the new Chief Election Commissioner. The Lok Sabha Lop, which is part of the committee led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, served his different opinion and called the selection process both 'disrespectful and unrest'.

What did the congress object?

The congress has objected to the process of appointing the main election commissioner and election commissioners.

The different note of Rahul Gandhi stated that the government of India had informed legislation in August 2023 shortly after the command of the Supreme Court that “the Spirit and the letter of the Supreme Court command”.

Rahul Gandhi further said the case said: “The government legislation has reconstituted the committee to appoint the CEC and election commissioners to be appointed the prime minister, leader of the opposition and a minister of Union by the prime minister and the removal of the chief judge the committee. “

“This government order was subsequently challenged by a public interest procedure. The Supreme Court has indicated that his intention to include this issue on February 19, 2025, less than forty -eight hours' drive, “said Rahul Gandhi.

The Congress had previously encouraged the government to postpone the selection meeting, because there is a case in the Supreme Court with regard to the appointment of the previous CEC.

“The Congrest Party has argued that the selection process must be postponed until the Supreme Court decides on the petitions that challenge the new appointment process,” wrote the congress on X.

Rahul Gandhi focuses on PM Modi, Amit Shah

Rahul Gandhi criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi's decision to exclude the supreme judge of India from the selection committee.

He said that by violating the command of the Supreme Court and the “removal” of the supreme court of the selection committee, the government “has worsened the concerns of hundreds of millions of voters about the integrity of our election process.”

“As the LOP, it is my duty to maintain the ideals of Babasaheb Ambedkar and the basic leaders of our nation and to call the government to account,” said Rahul Gandhi.

He added: “It is both disrespectful and unable for the prime minister and HM to have taken a midnight decision to select the new CEC, when the composition of the committee and the process is challenged in the Supreme Court and is heard in . than forty -eight hours. '

BJP responds: “malignant judicial activism”

The BJP rejected Rahul Gandhi's criticism of the appointment of the main election commissioner and an election commissioner as “politically motivated” and accused him of undermining the constitutional mandate of an elected government by “malicious” judicial activism.

BJP's IT department head of Amit Malviya said: “It is an attempt to undermine the constitutional mandate of the chosen government by malignant judicial activism. .over, it is convenient and interprets the judgment of the Supreme Court about the appointment of the CEC.”

He noted that a bank with the constitution of five judges had revised the trial for appointing members of the India election committee (ECI) in 2023, ruled that the president should appoint the CEC and election commissioners on the basis of the recommendation of a Commission that exists the prime minister, LOP in Lok Sabha and the supreme judge of India.

However, the court clarified that this regulation would only remain in force until the parliament established a law that has established a permanent mechanism, Malviya said.